I have written previously about the need to hold prosecutors accountable for misconduct in pursuing convictions. Prosecutors play a unique and powerful role in criminal justice: they often direct police investigations, they determine when and how to charge crimes, and they decide what information generated by law enforcement will be turned over to the defense prior to trial. Jurors commonly view prosecutors as altruistic and objective defenders of victims' rights and the common good, in contrast to "hired gun" defense attorneys. Therefore, an unscrupulous or overzealous prosecutor has an unparalleled opportunity to distort the criminal justice process.
Please don't misunderstand -- I am not out to get prosecutors. In fact, I have tremendous respect for the office and I admire a great many prosecutors whom I know professionally and personally. But as in any other profession, a few bad apples can taint the entire barrel.
When prosecutorial misconduct is serious enough to require overturning a conviction, consequences are in order. Prosecutors are largely immune from lawsuits based on their actions in prosecuting a case, so we must look elsewhere for disincentives. Many years ago, when the Chicago Tribune still supported in-depth investigative reporting on criminal justice, the paper ran a series that pointed out how prosecutors who commit misonduct are rarely identified by name in appellate court decisions: Chicago Tribune series: Trial and Error
Therefore, when these same prosecutors run for judge or other higher office, the public is unaware of this important information. For instance, when the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the conviction of Center on Wrongful Convictions client Alan Beaman last year because the prosecutor suppressed exculpatory information, the Court did not name the prosecutor, James Souk, who is now an elected judge in McLean County: Illinois Supreme Court decision in Alan Beaman case
Compare this to a recent decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, blasting a federal prosecutor - by name - for her false and misleading statements at trial: Chicago Tribune article: federal judge scolds prosecutor Such judicial criticism might serve as a powerful deterrent against prosecutorial overreaching -- even for non-elected federal prosecutors.
A Texas legislator has suggested going so far as to criminalize prosecutorial failure to disclose exculpatory information to the defense. While this proposed bill may be extreme, it is a reaction to a large number of Texas wrongful convictions recently uncovered through DNA testing, some of which involved prosecutorial misbehavior: Fort Worth Star-Telegram article
Certainly some form of sanction for flagrant misconduct is appropriate: to educate young prosecutors, to dissuade the veterans from crossing the line, to inform the public, and to preserve the good name of the majority of prosecutors who uphold their oath of office with integrity and honor.
How interesting that James Souk, the prosecutor in the wrongful conviction Beaman case, is the judge who allowed Michael Connolly unsupervised visits which resulted in Connolly murdering his two children! This is insane, really. Why is Souk in the justice business? How can we get him out?
Posted by: Tina Bina | April 01, 2009 at 02:30 PM
We maybe able to remove Souk?? An online petition has been established. I could not find it,alittle help. Everyone pls contact illinois reform commission and state a case for reforming ISP,CPD,states att'y,judges. We must ADDRESS the entire COMBINE,not just campaign reform. An Illinois reform commission that REFUSE to address crooked cop issues. How very combine. We need YOUR help. contact IRC.org
Posted by: Mr. Quigley | April 13, 2009 at 10:13 AM
while being a victim of the justice system, i learned that prosecutors are the most powerful piece in the game of life that is played in the court room. they have the ability to pursue or decline a case. why do some many have this everybody is guilty attitude, DO THEY NOT KNOW LIFE? are they being taught this blind anger in law school?
one thing is for sure, some needs to give a quick slap to the justice system, starting with the prosecuter's and dont forget the street cops, because there morals are lost also!
williamyancey6076@hotmail.com
Posted by: william | July 04, 2009 at 02:51 AM
While many prosecutors are excellent attorneys with impeccable ethics, it is unfair to assume that their criminal defense bretheren are somehow tainted by their representation of alleged criminals. The truth is that many prosecutors switch professions to become a criminal defense attorneys later in their career. I work for a San Francisco criminal defense firm where several of the attorneys are former prosecutors and one is a former police officer. One of our attorneys left criminal defense to become a district attorney. There are good and bad apple attorneys on both sides of the fence.
Posted by: Scott Harris | November 19, 2009 at 06:52 PM